With this week’s focus on
assessments, I decided to concentrate my actions on creating an appropriate
assessment for my first GAME plan goal. In this first goal, I aim to create an
authentic learning experience for my students. They will be put into groups
representing the Weather-Wise Travel Agency. Within the project, groups will be
given a client for whom they need to design a vacation package. Their client
will make requests as to the time of year they want to vacation (spring,
summer, fall, winter), the type of location that they visit (city, beach, mountain,
desert, etc.), and the type of weather they hope to experience on their trip
(hot and sunny, windy, rainy, cold and snowy, etc.). Student groups will
research their clients’ wishes and make a recommendation for their trip in the form
of a group travel brochure and presentation. Within these presentations, groups
must share their clients’ requests and explain the rationale for why they
selected the particular vacation site. Because this problem-based activity
presents many challenges for grading, I have decided that a rubric will be the
best way to assess learning.
Rubrics are a helpful type of
assessment because they allow a teacher to assess student work without
subjectivity, and they provide an opportunity for the teacher to share feedback
with the student (Cennamo, Ross, & Ertmer, 2009). According to Cennamo et
al. (2009), “Rubrics are framed by some type of scale, but the degrees of the
scale are clearly described or defined to demonstrate different levels of
quality” (p. 155). Brookhart (1999) explains, “Your rubric should relate to the
standards or learning goals for the activity, lesson, or project and the
descriptions should clearly describe the levels of performance rather than
subjective judgements” (as cited in Cennamo, et al., 2009, p. 155). Below you
can find the rubric that I have created for use within this authentic learning experience.
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
Client’s
wishes
|
All of
client’s wishes are clearly defined.
|
Most of
client’s wishes are clearly defined.
|
Client’s
wishes are not clearly defined.
|
Client’s
wishes are not defined.
|
Vacation
Site
|
Vacation
site is identified and vividly described.
|
Vacation
site is identified and described.
|
Vacation
site is identified.
|
Vacation
site is not identified or described.
|
Rationale
|
Rationale
for vacation site selection is clearly described and based upon evidence
found in research.
|
Rationale
for vacation site selection is described and loosely based upon evidence
found in research.
|
Rationale
for vacation site selection is clearly described.
|
Rationale
for vacation site selection is not described.
|
Understanding
of Content
|
Rationale
demonstrates clear understanding of the content (weather patterns).
|
Rationale
demonstrates understanding of the content (weather patterns). While no inaccuracies
are made, understanding is not clearly demonstrated.
|
Rationale
demonstrates some understanding of the content (weather patterns). Some inaccuracies
are made in rationale.
|
Rationale
does not demonstrate an understanding of the content (weather patterns).
|
Brochure
|
Brochure
is visually appealing with no errors in grammar or spelling. All project requirements
are present.
|
Brochure
may or may not be visually appealing with very few (1-2) errors in grammar or
spelling. All project requirements are present.
|
Brochure
is not visually appealing or has many errors in grammar or spelling. One
project requirement is missing.
|
Brochure
is not visually appealing and has many errors in grammar or spelling. More
than one project requirement is missing.
|
Sources
|
All
sources are listed in appropriate format.
|
All
sources are listed. There are few (1-3) errors in format.
|
Not all
sources are listed OR many (4+) errors exist in format.
|
Sources
are not listed OR format is inaccurate.
|
Presentation
|
All presenters
demonstrate good speaking skills (eye contact, volume, etc.). Presentation
shows signs that it has been rehearsed.
|
Most presenters
demonstrate good speaking skills (eye contact, volume, etc.). Presentation
shows signs that it has been rehearsed.
|
Few presenters
demonstrate good speaking skills (eye contact, volume, etc.). Presentation may
or may not show signs that it has been rehearsed.
|
Presenters
do not demonstrate good speaking skills (eye contact, volume, etc.).
Presentation has not been rehearsed.
|
References:
Cennamo, K., Ross, J. & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc., Custom ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Cennamo, K., Ross, J. & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc., Custom ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Liza,
ReplyDeleteYou've created a great rubric for the project you describe. I teach ninth grade English, and I use a rubric to grade the majority of my students' work; I've found it is the best way to be as objective as possible (especially with creative projects). I also send a copy of the rubric home to parents so that they are aware of my expectations, and many of them really appreciate it.
The project you describe is definitely an authentic one. I am sure your students are going to enjoy working on their brochure, and your rubric will increase the quality of their final products. Thanks for sharing the rubric
Holly
I personally love using rubrics, as well! I feel that my students become overwhelmed and distracted by expectations and directions. When the information is clearly stated and they have a copy to have, it seems to remove much of the apprehension and confusion. Also, it provides them with a basis and practical suggestions for improvement. I also agree with Holly's post. Your rubric that you provided will definitely set the groundwork for their project. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete